Pôle SEA, Université de Genève
Questionnaire Formation Continue
Formation Continue
Example: Questionnaire module / course
1.1 Part or all of the module / course took place remotely.
2.1 The objectives of this module / course were communicated.
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
2.2 The objectives of this module / course were clearly stated.
2.3 The objectives of this module / course were achieved.
3.1 The content covered was relevant to my training needs.
3.2 The content covered enriches my professional practice.
3.3 The module / course combined scientific knowledge and professional practice.
3.4 The different parts of the module / course have formed a coherent whole.
3.5 The fact that this module / course took place remotely was an added value for me (additional skills, use of software, working methods, organisational flexibility, etc.).
4.1 The pedagogical modalities used (presentations, practical exercises, fieldwork, case studies, questioning, discussions, debates, collaborative online activities, etc.) facilitated my learning.
4.2 The course materials for this module / course (documentation, handouts, etc.) facilitated the learning process.
4.3 An environment conducive to exchanges and interactions (questions, reflections, discussions, etc.) has been created.
4.4 Despite the physical distance, a class spirit (group dynamics, sense of belonging, interaction between participants) has developed.
The following questions address the adequacy between the credits associated with the module / course you have completed, and the workload they actually represented for you. Please note that the usual correspondence at the University of Geneva is: 1 credit = 25 to 30 hours of work for the participants (including attendance at the course, readings, exercises, exam preparation, contact with the teacher, etc.).
5.1 The workload advertised (on the brochure, website, etc.) corresponded to the amount of time I took to carry out the task requested.
5.2 I think the workload associated with this module / course is appropriate in relation to the number of credits targeted.
5.3 The time it took me to get familiar with the distance learning tools was reasonable.
6.1 The pedagogical support (clear instructions, answers to my questions) was satisfactory.
6.2 I have received sufficient support to adapt my working methods to distance learning.
6.3 I have received sufficient support to become familiar with the different tools used in this module / course (Zoom, Moodle, Mediaserver, Padlet, Onedrive, Speakup, Votamatic, etc.).
6.4 The feedback (comments, remarks, answers, suggestions) provided by the teachers helped my learning.
6.5 The feedback (comments, remarks, answers, suggestions) provided by the other participants contributed to my progress.
7.1 The practical information I received before the start of the module / course facilitated my participation.
7.2 The rooms provided were conducive to the smooth running of the module / course.
7.3 The digital tools for remote teaching (Zoom, Moodle, Mediaserver, etc.) were conducive to the smooth running of the module / course.
8.1 The assessment modalities were clearly communicated at the beginning of the module / course.
8.2 Has the assessment for this module / course already taken place?
If Yes
8.3 It was consistent with the contents.
8.4 It has contributed to my progress.
8.5 If it took place remotely, the remote assessment modalities were conducive to its smooth functioning.
9.1 Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of this module / course.
To help us improve this programme, please be specific in your comments and make suggestions for improvement.
10.1 What are the strong points of this module / course?
10.2 What are the elements to be improved (e.g., unsatisfactory elements, missing elements, etc.)?
10.3 Your suggestions and comments
Licence accordée à Université de Genève - evasys V8.2 (2294) - Copyright © 2021 evasys GmbH . Tous droits réservés.
